🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.